- Nouvelles
- cas de récupération de la barytine : usine de traitement et équipement
- comment traiter les minerais de cuivre oxydés ?
- usine d'extraction de minerai d'étain alluvionnaire 50tph au nigeria
- processus de traitement du graphite
- mine machine factory have make a stlb30 centrifugal for gold mine
- moulin à boulets pour le broyage humide du sable de quartz
- méthode de déferrisation et de purification de l'argile kaolinique
- extraction et traitement de l'or alluvial
- usine d'extraction de sable de plage 20tph en inde
- 12tph processus de séparation par gravité de la roche, du plomb, du zinc et du cuivre
Nouvelles
concentrateur falcon vs knelson
Temps: 2024-09-07
Both Falcon and Knelson are well-known brands in the field of gravity concentration, specialized in the recovery of fine gold and other minerals. Here's a brief comparison to help highlight their differences:
Falcon Concentrators
-
Design:
- Typically feature a bowl with a high-speed rotating action to enhance separation.
- Equipped with different models like C, SB, and UF to cater to various applications from mineral beneficiation to ultra-fine recovery.
-
Advantages:
- Highly efficient at recovering fine particles, even below 20 microns.
- Wash water helps to keep the concentrate fluidized, enhancing recovery rates.
- Continuous and semi-continuous operation options.
-
Applications:
- Commonly used in mining operations where fine particle recovery is crucial.
- Suitable for alluvial deposits, hard rock mining, and pre-concentration.
Knelson Concentrators
-
Design:
- Characterized by a cone-shaped bowl that employs a high-G force for separation.
- Utilizes a batch-type recovery system, typically operated in cycles.
-
Advantages:
- Known for robust construction and simple operation.
- Effective especially for the recovery of free gold that is often lost in more traditional recovery systems.
- High concentrating capability with significant recovery of fine gold.
-
Applications:
- Widely used in gold mining operations around the world.
- Equally effective for primary and placer gold recovery.
Key Comparisons
- Efficiency: Falcons are often preferred for ultra-fine recovery, even below 20 microns, while Knelson concentrators are also highly effective but can excel especially in recovering free gold particles.
- Operation: Knelson typically uses a batch process, whereas Falcons offer both continuous and semi-continuous operation, which can provide constant recovery in some scenarios.
- Maintenance and Operation: Falcons might require more frequent maintenance due to their high-speed components, compared to the generally simpler design of Knelson concentrators.
Your specific needs in terms of particle size, type of ore, and operational preferences will determine which concentrator is more suitable for your application.
