- Nouvelles
- comment traiter les minerais aurifères contenant de l'antimoine ?
- usine de recyclage du kaolin 150tph
- processus d'extraction de l'or par cyanuration
- concasseur de roche mobile pour l'exploitation de carrières et de mines
- principales réserves minérales de terres rares par pays 2019
- l'exploitation minière en eaux profondes est-elle mauvaise pour l'environnement ?
- minéralisation des bulles pendant la flottation
- usine de récupération de scories de ferrochrome 20tph en afrique du sud
- étude de cas : flux de processus d'extraction de diamants 8tph en angola
- séparation électrostatique des minéraux par rouleaux
Nouvelles
concentrateur falcon vs knelson
Temps: 2024-09-07
Both Falcon and Knelson are well-known brands in the field of gravity concentration, specialized in the recovery of fine gold and other minerals. Here's a brief comparison to help highlight their differences:
Falcon Concentrators
-
Design:
- Typically feature a bowl with a high-speed rotating action to enhance separation.
- Equipped with different models like C, SB, and UF to cater to various applications from mineral beneficiation to ultra-fine recovery.
-
Advantages:
- Highly efficient at recovering fine particles, even below 20 microns.
- Wash water helps to keep the concentrate fluidized, enhancing recovery rates.
- Continuous and semi-continuous operation options.
-
Applications:
- Commonly used in mining operations where fine particle recovery is crucial.
- Suitable for alluvial deposits, hard rock mining, and pre-concentration.
Knelson Concentrators
-
Design:
- Characterized by a cone-shaped bowl that employs a high-G force for separation.
- Utilizes a batch-type recovery system, typically operated in cycles.
-
Advantages:
- Known for robust construction and simple operation.
- Effective especially for the recovery of free gold that is often lost in more traditional recovery systems.
- High concentrating capability with significant recovery of fine gold.
-
Applications:
- Widely used in gold mining operations around the world.
- Equally effective for primary and placer gold recovery.
Key Comparisons
- Efficiency: Falcons are often preferred for ultra-fine recovery, even below 20 microns, while Knelson concentrators are also highly effective but can excel especially in recovering free gold particles.
- Operation: Knelson typically uses a batch process, whereas Falcons offer both continuous and semi-continuous operation, which can provide constant recovery in some scenarios.
- Maintenance and Operation: Falcons might require more frequent maintenance due to their high-speed components, compared to the generally simpler design of Knelson concentrators.
Your specific needs in terms of particle size, type of ore, and operational preferences will determine which concentrator is more suitable for your application.
